Saturday, April 12, 2014

Senate Fail. We the People Are Not Amused


So in the wake of yet more gun carnage in America, there was yet another bill in Congress with a loophole for gun purchasers carefully crafted in to protect the rights of gun owners. It was authored by two legislators ,vetted and given an A+ by the gun lobby, and in spite of all that it failed to pass.

 I don't know about you, but I am absolutely stunned that the bi-partisan bill  to close the background check loophole could not pass the senate.  In spite of phone calls and cajoling by both the President and Vice President, and most of all, in spite of the emotional appeals made by the parents of  Sandy Hook Connecticut, the bill did not garner the 60 votes necessary to pass the Senate.

The score stands Gun Lobby 1 and the people of the United States a big, fat zero.  Yes indeed folks, here in America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, we have the best Congress money can buy.  RIP dead children of Sandy Hook.

Thursday, October 31, 2013

A Zombie Halloween for Tea Partiers


Yes, I know this cartoon is snarky, but then I am a liberal.   As a self proclaimed liberal, I have become used to being called a moron, Fascist, Commie idiot, tree hugging, latte drinking jerk  and worse by rage filled right wing trolls, so it's about time I descended to the Tea Party level and stopped trying for civilized discourse.  Whatever happened to real political discussion with people who don't bellieve the way you do?  It seems to have disappeared forever from the American political scene  .


 Its disappearance is the reason  I've basically stopped writing here and stopped watching all TV news. The "one from the right and one from the left" talking head formula leaves me less than satisfied and stimulates an awful, mud-slinging attitude rather than a spirit of compromise. Add to that all the doomsday, conspiracy theory stuff and I have just about had it.


But here it is, Halloween, and why not take one last swipe at Fox News and the Tea Party before I exit stage left. ( notice I am exiting stage left and NOT stage right)    Don't get me wrong..... I'm not taking this blog down, I just don't have the stomach to post here these days.   I may get my groove back and find myself impassioned about the American political scene once again. You never know.  In the meantime, thanks to everyone who has read and commented and been generally supportive over the years.  I'm getting offline and going out to go trick or treating..... I may be gone till Christmas or the New Year, who knows.  I'll let you know if and when I come back..... meanwhile, enjoy Halloween and don't eat too much candy.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Daniel Ellsberg Publicly Supports Edward Snowden


 
 Daniel Ellsberg Time Cover, back in the day

Did we all see the Op-Ed piece in Sunday's Washington Post by Daniel Ellsberg?  Well, if you haven't read it, you should, and just in case you are one of the few people on the planet who has not heard of Ellsberg (because Snowden is constantly being compared to him), let someone who is old enough to remember Nixon and Watergate and the Viet Nam War tell you that he was some kind of hero.   I'm impressed that Ellsberg spoke out in favor of Snowden.  Here's a quote:
Many people compare Edward Snowden to me unfavorably for leaving the country and seeking asylum, rather than facing trial as I did. I don’t agree. The country I stayed in was a different America, a long time ago.
After the New York Times had been enjoined from publishing the Pentagon Papers — on June 15, 1971, the first prior restraint on a newspaper in U.S. history — and I had given another copy to The Post (which would also be enjoined), I went underground with my wife, Patricia, for 13 days. My purpose (quite like Snowden’s in flying to Hong Kong) was to elude surveillance while I was arranging — with the crucial help of a number of others, still unknown to the FBI — to distribute the Pentagon Papers sequentially to 17 other newspapers, in the face of two more injunctions. The last three days of that period was in defiance of an arrest order: I was, like Snowden now, a “fugitive from justice.”

 Like Snowden, Ellsberg leaked damaging information about how the government lied to the American people.  In 1971  Ellsberg, a former military analyst at the Pentagon,  gave classified information in the form of  " The Pentagon Papers" to  influential news media  and was promptly arrested under the espionage act for doing so.  He too was called a patriot by some and a traitor by others.  The protest against the Viet Nam War was gaining ground at this time and exposing the way the government had lied to the people in order to get Americans to fight this war was fueling public fury.  The government was highly embarrassed by Ellsberg's revelations. He was  charged and put on trial, facing  the possibility of up to 115 years in prison.  In 1973,  during the depths of the  Nixon Administration's Watergate debacle, the trial was suspended and all charges eventually dropped. Oh, and just by chance, guess who had influence and got started in government during the ill fated Nixon Administration?  If you guessed Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney you would be right on the money ( to coin a phrase). Just thought I'd mention it.

There is no question that Edward Snowden has technically broken the law by revealing classified information to the public, but like Daniel Ellsberg, he has done so for patriotic reasons.  The government is trying to paint him as an egotistical high school drop out who somehow got hold of government secrets and who deserves to be punished. I see a tech saavy dedicated young man ready to sacrifice his life to get a much needed conversation about personal privacy vs. government control started. His actions are already having an international effect. Whatever you think of Edward Snowden, he is not the first whistleblower to be relentlessly pursued for embarrassing powerful people. Daniel Ellsberg is only one who went before him.  Three highly placed technical officials at NSA Thomas Drake, William Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe have been trying to public attention to  the NSA and the extent of government surveillance on private citizens since 9/11.

Snowden is following in the footsteps of some very brave  and patriotic people.  He has opened a door to the secret doings of an agency that few of us even knew was there. Like Ellsberg, Binney, and Wiebe before him, he is a man who knows that " sunshine is the best disinfectant"  The " secrets" he is divulging to the public ( not selling to a foreign government)  may end up sparking a very important discussion that can save our democracy in this electronic age.  Only time will tell.



Sunday, June 23, 2013

How Edward Snowden Woke Up America, Got the Left and Right to Agree, Screwed the NSA, And the Irony of It All




Are we all following the narrative of Edward Snowden, super-techie and former CIA computer security wizard?  Depending on who you talk to, he's either a modern day Danial Ellsberg or worse than Benedict Arnold.  Nobody is luke warm, but necessity is making for some very strange bedfellows.  Both liberal Democrats and conservative, small government Libertarians are, ironically, united in their support of Snowden. Geeks and Techi-types  who understand what the rest of us don't are also on the Snowden bandwagon. The majority of rank and file Americans either reflexively revile him as a tattletale or buy the party line that he is a spy and a traitor. One way or another,I think we have all heard of him by now.

Personally, I can't take my eyes off my twitter feed and the TV screen as the action heats up today, even though with  the post election deadlock in Washington, I have sworn off politics, particularly political blogging, as too depressing.  But, this is just too much. It is a fascinating situation worthy of Dan Brown or John Le Carre.  I have to say a few words. There are so many ironies here that I hardly know where to start and I certainly don't know what is going on.

When Edward Snowden made his initial revelations to Glenn Greenwald via The Guardian earlier this month, I was interested but I only really started listening once the reactions started.   On the internet, sentiment among my fellow Democrats was basically pro Snowden. He wasn't peddling miltary secrets to foreign governments.  He was sounding a warning to the world about the scope of American government surveillance out of a sense of moral indignation. He was a GenY activist and collegial idealist trying to improve the world in the time honored American tradition of civil disobedience.   An equally vocal group(including much of the media following what I believe now were government talking points) felt he was a self important petty bureaucrat crying wolf, betraying the country and possessing ulterior motives for making classified information public, not to mention  breaking the law. On the playground of life, nobody likes a tattletale, especially not those being tattled on.

By last week Snowden had gone to ground in Hong Kong  and all the TV talking heads had their marching orders. They were in rare form.   General Alexander, head of the NSA and President Obama and a bunch of others assured us all that nobody was reading our email or listening to our phone calls. They were only collecting something called " metadata" in order to protect us. They patted us on the head and told us not to worry. The metadata they had collected had saved us from 50 terrorist attacks, they said.  Privacy was valued and could not be violated without a court order.

I'm usually not much of a Fox News fan, being liberal and all, but the video below which offers a lot of comment on General Alexander's testimony was quite interesting. Even Fox found the General evasive about what the NSA could and could not do.  At last, an issue both right and left wingers can unite on.


Imagine how shocked I was when I found out  about the scope and the very real dangers of government surveillance. There was no mistake.  The powers that be had lied. First I saw a video of a roundtable done by USA today featuring three former NSA employees who have been trying for years to go through channels to blow the whistle on the agency's  un-constitutional activities. These are highly trained computer scientists, not low level people.William Binney worked for NSA for  30 years,eventually becoming the technical director of the of the world geopolitical and military analysis and reporting group. He was pressured to retire in 2001, but he never stopped talking and trying to get somebody to pay attention.

All three men support Edward Snowden and say he was able to do what they wanted to do. i.e. let the American people and the world know just how much secret government spying is going on.  Please watch the video.  It shook my tree and I hope it makes you ask some questions as well.




Next  I read an article in The Guardian by James Naughton that explained it all to a non technical, liberal arts major,like me.   He explained why "metadata" was not innocuous.  Indeed, it is how you or I could end up on a "no fly" list or indeed even a secret kill list by mistake and never know about it.  It is the stuff that databases are made of.  It is about patterns and mathematics not people. And this is how the government can go back and assemble anything it wants about you anytime.  Here's a quote: Please follow the link above to read the entire article. It is very enlightening.
... Of course there's no content involved, for the simple reason that content is a pain in the butt from the point of view of modern surveillance. First, you have to listen to the damned recordings, and that requires people (because even today, computers are not great at understanding everyday conversation) and time. And although Senator Feinstein let slip that the FBI already employs 10,000 people "doing intelligence on counter-terrorism", even that Stasi-scale mob isn't a match for the torrent of voice recordings that Verizon and co could cough up daily for the spooks.
So in this business at least, content isn't king. It's the metadata – the call logs showing who called whom, from which location and for how long – that you want. Why? Because that's the stuff that is machine-readable, and therefore searchable.

Then came today and a whole new raft of Sunday talk shows.  Edward Snowden left HongKong in the spotlight. He sure knows how to take advantage of a slow news day.  He hopped a plane for Moscow while Hong Kong authorities did the Pontius Pilate thing and washed their hands of the whole affair via a CYA press release.The release went viral on the internet as it gave Washington a very polite, diplomatic middle finger salute.

 Then came the bombshell. Snowden was headed for Moscow.  You could hear them screaming in Washington. As I write he is bedded down in the airport in Moscow, ready to leave for Ecuador in the morning.  Let's see what happens.  He also , I am told, has four laptops full of official secrets in his possession. He's a valuable commodity.  Uneasy lies the head etc. etc. I bet there is a whole lot of scrambling going on in the Kremlin.

Now here is another irony. Snowden, the champion of freedom and government transparency, is being aided by Moscow to get to Ecuador. Let's see, the freedom fighter has been helped by two totalitarian, communist countries, China and Russia, and is going to Ecuador, countries not exactly noted for their positive human rights policies or their open governments. How ironic is that?  You just can't make this stuff up.

Meanwhile, President Obama' s approval rating is tanking. Left, right and center are all displeased with him.  Libertarian Senator Rand Paul is hailing Snowden as a hero and criticizing Obama. New York Senator Chuck Schumer thinks Snowden is a traitor and is furious at Obama.This issue could really be a tipping point for the administration.  Welcome to your second term, Mr. Obama.  Enjoy the ride.

Me?  I think that attempting to corral and control internet transparency is futile. In the long run it just won't work. The old paradigm is over. It's the 21st century. I'm not sure what I think of Edward Snowden, but I know that he has started a conversation that needs to be had, not just in the United States, but all over the world.  I think charging him with espionage is ridiculous. He's not selling secrets to foreign governments.  He's telling the world what it needs to know. Something for which he is likely to suffer greatly in the end.   I know it won't happen, but I think we should  just say thank you and deal with it.



Friday, May 10, 2013

Mothers Day and Ariel Castro



52 year old Ariel Castro is fast becoming known as the Cleveland monster for good reason. He's not exactly the son a mother can be proud of.  As the details of his life, and what he did to the three girls he kidnapped a decade ago become better known, his mother has made no secret of her revulsion and her heartbreak over the situation she finds herself in. She must have known something was wrong years ago, but not been able to speak out.. Perhaps she was unwilling, or in denial.  Whatever her story is, it hides a great deal of pain.  Family secrets and lies are an old and sad story, and the bigger the secret the worse the pain when it is revealed.

 Lillian Castro, the monster's mother, is quoted by the BBC as saying: "I have a sick son who has committed something very grave. I'm suffering very much,...May those young ladies forgive me."  Not exactly a fabulous Mother's Day for her this year, and knowing maternal guilt as I do, I can imagine she feels plenty bad,though her grief can do nothing to help the " young ladies" she is apologizing to and few in the general public will shed a tear on her behalf.  Still, I cannot help thinking about her as Mother's Day approaches.  What a bummer.

Then there is the pain of Castro's oldest daughter, the one he had with his common law wife ,Grimilda Figueroa. Grimalda, it seems,left Ariel Castro years ago and died last year after a long illness.She too  was beaten, tortured, and subjected ( with her two children) to nightmarish abuse.  

The couple's daughter was interviewed by CNN in the wake of her father's arrest.  Seems she had some vague idea that all was not right, but never put two and two together.  Check out the video below.  It just blows my mind that all this information was around and nobody was on this guy's case before now.

This Mothers Day lets give some thought  to how abusers like Ariel Castro can get away with their heinous crimes for years, even decades, before anybody blows the whistle on them. Crimes against women are still crimes and they cast a long shadow over generations.   If  Amanda Berry had not managed to call 911 Ariel Cstro would still be running his House of Horrors.

 I wonder if he sent his mother flowers last Mothers Day?


" He's Dead To Me" Says Castro's Daughter

Sunday, April 21, 2013

The Tsarnaev Brothers Are Losers Not Terrorists



Let's get something straight. Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev,  the brothers responsible for the Boston Marathon bombing and 176 casualties including 3 deaths and 17  critical injuries, are punks or, as their Uncle said in the video below at a press conference yesterday, " losers who couldn't fit in". To call them " terrorists" elevates their status to something approaching  heroic as in, warriors, idealists giving their lives for a cause greater than themselves, or something other than narcissistic cowards.  Let's not romanticize these guys.  They were indeed losers, punks, misfits and just the sort of young, testosterone-fueled guys Islamic extremists encourage as canon fodder and nothing more. These guys are to Islam, what The Westboro Baptist Church is to Christianity--LOSERS! ( thank you @Yasira jaan)


 Let's review a few facts.   The SUV the boys took off in a day after the bombing while Boston was crawling with police was track-able by GPS. With the cops in hot pursuit, they threw home made grenades out the windows(not great military tactics) until there was a stand off. When cornered,Dzokhar gunned the SUV, ran over his brother, and dragged him to his death. Then, he took off to hide in a boat in a backyard in Watertown. Oh, did I mention that what started the chase was the boys trying to hold up a convenience store and shooting an MIT campus cop to death? Not the actions of well disciplined trained guarillas wishing to avoid detection, are they?. Like I said-- punks and losers.

It may be true that the older brother went back to Russia and tried to connect with Chchen rebels, but I bet they didn't want anything to do with such a loose canon and I also bet the bulk of his radicalization took place in Boston, online and in his own mind.  Surely, Boston was where he was when he was posting jihadi videos on YouTube and bitching all over Facebook about how he didn't have any American friends.

On the other hand, he seems to have married an American girl and has a three year old daughter. And, he seems to have had trouble finding a career path or even a job. Obviously he was a troubled dude, trying to make it on his own and not doing very well.  I am guessing that his wife threw him out as I read somewhere that he had an arrest for domestic violence.  That would explain why, if he was a husband and father, he was living with his brother in a squalid, ramshjackle apartment  instead of with his wife and child.

What better way for a self hating, self pitying piece of human garbage to try and make himself feel heroic than to see himself as a martyr for Islam? The reality was,he did not fit in, either in Russia or America. To avoid this painful reality, he projected his anger onto his adopted country, took his kid brother along for the ride and ended up basically committing suicide by cop.  Tamerlan is not someone mothers hope their sons will grow  up to be like.  No sireee, not by a long shot.

 I feel sorry for the family.  My prayers are with them as well as the real victims of this atrocity.  But I do not feel sorry for these two misguided young men.  Don't give them the dignity of calling them " terrorists"  They are nothing but a couple of punks.  The older one is dead. The younger one will recover, will be tried as an American citizen in an American court and will do lots of time in an American prison if he is lucky.  If he is not so lucky, and is tried in Federal Court, he could end up dead too.  We have the death penalty here in America, you know. And from time to time, we use it.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Waiting for the Chinese Smackdown on North Korea


 

China and North Korea 



It's going to happen soon. China is going to rein in  its "Mini-Me",,North Korea.  The storm clouds are brewing, and I predict that next week will tell the tale.  Traditionally, China has sat on the sidelines and just watched tensions between North Korea and the United States, but as North Korea's young dictator, Kim Jong Un, gets whackier and whackier, China seems to be shifting its position.  In actuality, it has little choice. The new North Korean regime is so unpredictable and dysfunctional that putting it in a straight jacket or destroying it altogether may be the only logical possibilities for China.

Where China is concerned, Kim Jong Un  has made some bad mistakes. Since coming to power after his father's death last year, he has failed to pay proper respect to China (especially stupid in the part of the world that invented the concept of " saving face"). Most importantly, it's dumb to ignore the country which provides you with food, fuel, and the parental protection of a bigger, stronger Communist power.... talk about biting the hand that feeds you ! Now, having taken his bellicose outbursts to a new level that really begs for intervention from the West, Baby Kim is just asking for trouble with China, the United States and EU.

Why China Doesn't Want War in Korea


The last thing China wants is for North Korea to go to war ,or for the United States to get more involved militarily in Asia. In addition, with its own domestic troubles China certainly doesn't need waves of North Korean refugees pouring across its borders. It also fears a re-united Korea with the South in the saddle.

So, the winds of change are blowing in Beijing, and Baby Kim better wake up and smell the coffee or he is going to get himself, and possibly his whole nation ,bunker busted back to the stone age. Unfortunately, he probably won't stop, as he is young, callow and responding to immediate domestic concerns. He is on a collision course with China and the West.  Looks to me like China is doing a rapid about-face.

For starters, Secretary of State, John Kerry has stopped off in China this week-end, on his way home form a well publicized visit to South Korea. While in Seoul, he pointedly announced in no uncertain terms, that the United States will protect its allies in case of nuclear attack from North Korea.  It has also been reported( though not officially confirmed) that last week China was massing troops at its North Korean border. In the end, my money is on a pincer movement between China and the United States working together to snuff out the crazy one way or another.

Listen up, Baby Kim and start behaving, or China may have to spank you with Uncle Sam standing by.